Fix aom_hadamard_4x4_c() comments

The dynamic range stated by the comments was wrong, so this commit
fixes them to match the actual implementation.

Also, mention that the function is good for HBD usage, as this is
what's already happening inside highbd_wht_fwd_txfm().

Change-Id: Iaf7bc0101f4020221ee12d6181cc311cd7ad9b60
diff --git a/aom_dsp/avg.c b/aom_dsp/avg.c
index 5cba8a8..6cfbfdd 100644
--- a/aom_dsp/avg.c
+++ b/aom_dsp/avg.c
@@ -119,18 +119,20 @@
   int16_t buffer2[16];
   int16_t *tmp_buf = &buffer[0];
   for (idx = 0; idx < 4; ++idx) {
-    hadamard_col4(src_diff, src_stride, tmp_buf);  // src_diff: 9 bit
-                                                   // dynamic range [-255, 255]
+    // src_diff: 9 bit (8b), 13 bit (HBD)
+    // dynamic range [-255, 255] (8b), [-4095, 4095] (HBD)
+    hadamard_col4(src_diff, src_stride, tmp_buf);
     tmp_buf += 4;
     ++src_diff;
   }
 
   tmp_buf = &buffer[0];
   for (idx = 0; idx < 4; ++idx) {
-    hadamard_col4(tmp_buf, 4, buffer2 + 4 * idx);  // tmp_buf: 12 bit
-    // dynamic range [-2040, 2040]
-    // buffer2: 15 bit
-    // dynamic range [-16320, 16320]
+    // tmp_buf: 10 bit (8b), 14 bit (HBD)
+    // dynamic range [-510, 510] (8b), [-8190, 8190] (HBD)
+    // buffer2: 11 bit (8b), 15 bit (HBD)
+    // dynamic range [-1020, 1020] (8b), [-16380, 16380] (HBD)
+    hadamard_col4(tmp_buf, 4, buffer2 + 4 * idx);
     ++tmp_buf;
   }