)]}'
{
  "commit": "43be86dbffb1dec280f63d0c5b7c7a51fc48dd0d",
  "tree": "173aeb0cfa0e7078e09497465c25c9f0791bb903",
  "parents": [
    "00a203b7bc735e20a5d0a0cc6857983c859d077e"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Ronald S. Bultje",
    "email": "rsbultje@gmail.com",
    "time": "Tue Sep 08 14:35:24 2015 -0400"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Ronald S. Bultje",
    "email": "rsbultje@gmail.com",
    "time": "Wed Sep 16 19:35:53 2015 -0400"
  },
  "message": "vp10: remove double MV value check.\n\nThis has virtually no effect on coding efficiency, but it is more\nlogical from a theoretical perspective (since it makes no sense to\nme that you would exclude a MV from a list just because it\u0027s sign-\ninversed value is identical to a value already in a list), and it\nalso makes the code simpler (it removes a duplicate value check in\ncases where signbias is equal between the two MVs being compared).\n\nSee issue 662.\n\nChange-Id: I23e607c6de150b9f11d1372fb2868b813c322d37\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "c0a84567f2d358c6bb80a0242b21d805e5069804",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "vp10/common/mvref_common.c",
      "new_id": "26785606538e4cc266d259046cd8872d233e1e07",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "vp10/common/mvref_common.c"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "8e918b83a2eed81a0d200df7c00039c30290ea2d",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "vp10/common/mvref_common.h",
      "new_id": "0774f7035856447d98a8a0a004ad9b753bd27eb6",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "vp10/common/mvref_common.h"
    }
  ]
}